The NCAA's $2.8 billion settlement is in the spotlight, and it's shaking things up in college sports. And just like that, former athlete payments are on hold.
Title IX Tension
Attorney John Clune is at the forefront, filing an appeal in the 9th Circuit Court. Why? He argues the settlement violates Title IX. "We support a settlement of the case, just not an inaccurate one that violates federal law," Clune stated to ESPN. He claims a $1.1 billion error in calculating damages could harm women's sports.
The settlement earmarks up to 90% of the payout for football and men's basketball players. Clune's argument? If schools had paid athletes fairly, that money would've been shared equitably between men and women. Right now, it's all about the broadcast rights money.
The Legal Showdown
Judge Claudia Wilken gave the settlement a nod, despite objections from over a dozen athlete groups. Wilken decided Title IX wasn't part of the settlement's scope. But Clune and others aren't backing down. "Title IX was deliberately ignored," he said. This legal clash is far from over.
The NCAA plans to distribute that $2.8 billion over the next decade. But the appeals process could stretch for months, if not years. Until then, the current athletes can count on their checks starting July 1, while former athletes wait it out.
What's Next?
This settlement is a game-changer, but only if it holds up in court. The appeal is a critical turning point. If Clune and his clients succeed, it could redefine how college sports handle compensation. This isn't just about the money—it's about fairness and compliance with federal law.
The NCAA's next moves will be crucial. The clock is ticking, and the stakes are high. This settlement? It's just getting started. You could feel it coming.
More from United Volleyball Network:
Source: ESPN
